Classic Cocktails: The Last Word

The Last Word is a gin based cocktail that began at the Detroit Athletic Club in the 1920's.  After WWII, however, the Last Word slipped into obscurity in the cocktail universe for reasons unknown.  In the early 2000's, the drink began to make a resurgence starting in the Seattle area, and it's popularity continues to grow.

The Last Word consists of Gin, Green Chartreuse, Maraschino Liqueur, and Lime Juice all in equal parts.  The drink is a nice mix of sweet, sour, and pungent.  It's crisp and complex and is deceptively strong, mostly in part to the Green Chartreuse which weighs in with a 55% alcohol content.  It's a great cocktail that challenges and refreshes the pallet.  Enjoy!

Having the Last Word at the house

The Last Word 
1oz. Gin
1oz. Green Chartreuse
1oz. Maraschino Liqueur
1oz. Fresh squeezed and strained Lime Juice












Here is Robert Hess making the Last Word.

Hugh Hendry and David Einhorn

The video below is a recent one of Hugh Hendry followed by David Einhorn at the Buttonwood gathering in New York City.  The topics discussed are the topics that everyone is discussing ad nauseum, eg., Europe's 'Theatre of the Absurd', questions about China's flailing role as the global engine of growth, The US recession and of course the Federal Reserve.  If all this has been discussed ad nauseam, then why post a lengthy video of it here?

Two reasons:
1.  Hugh Hendry's macro views are well thought out, challenge conventional wisdom, and take into 2nd, 3rd, and 4th level affects.  I think he is on par with Ray Dalio as far as one of the few macro opinions worth considering.  As Howard Marks has correctly stated, it is impossible to predict these global outcomes.  In light of that, it is important to be prepared, and part of doing that is to listen to someone like Hendry as he presents multiple plausible outcomes and the collateral damage associated.

2.  Around the 55 minute mark David Einhorn takes the stage (after Hendry, I skipped straight to the Einhorn section, so I can't vouch for what's in between).  Einhorn doesn't discuss specific securities, but what he does do is give a thorough rebuttal as to why the Fed's ZIRP is not working and will continue to not work.  He feels that by punishing savers, you also punish consumption, which punishes sales, which punishes business growth.  He explains in much more detail.

FYI: Unfortunately, the video host (not Me!) is asking for your email to watch the video.  It didn't do that last night when I watched it on my phone... 

Watch live streaming video from theeconomist at livestream.com

East Coast Asset Management Q3 Letter - Inventing a Flying Machine

I've thought for some time now that Christopher Begg at East Coast writes one of the more interesting quarterly commentaries.  Begg always finds a unique way to tie a seemingly unrelated idea or concept to investing, underscoring Munger's philosophy of taking from all discipline's to form one's lattice work of mental models. 

Begg writes about East Coast's investment process and their use of checklists to fully understand how they see an investment and why they believe a margin of safety exists.  He also writes about the types of investments that East Coast seeks (Compounders, Transformations, and Work-Outs) and where they look to find their ideas.  East Coast prospects among the usual value suspects: spin-offs, post bankruptcy re-orgs, irrational sellers, political and economic clouds.

Embedded below is the letter in full.

East Coast 3Q 2012 Letter_Inventing a Flying Machine

Warren Buffett on CNBC

Warren Buffett discusses a range of topics this morning on CNBC with his favorite reporter, Becky Quick.


Buffett on US Housing Recovery
Buffett: Global Economy Slowing Buffett: Instincts go against QE3 Buffett: We Mostly Buy Stocks for Future Earnings Buffett: We will add 8,000 jobs organically Buffett: We Buy on an all Equity Basis GE's Immelt: Trend is still positive with volatility Where Buffett is Investing Now Buffett: Election comes down to who has a better Ground Game Buffett: Eurozone Banking Problems Cloud Recovery Buffett's Final Word: Hold

NCAT: Don't fear the FOMO

Much attention has been brought to the area of behavioral economics in the past decade, and rightfully so.  To paraphrase Charlie Munger, "If economics isn't behavioral, then what the hell is it?"  Benjamin Graham had this to say long before behavioral economics was widely considered as relevant as it is today: “The investor’s chief problem — and even his worst enemy — is likely to be himself.”

Shooting one's self in one's foot while investing frequently happens when an investor's emotions override and suppress clear and logical thought.  These emotions span a broad range of fear, euphoria, greed, envy, information overload, uninformed decision making, thumbsucking, confirmation bias, and on and on.  (For the definitive guide on emotional bias in decision making see Munger's "The Psychgology of Human Misjudgement" found in Poor Charlie's Almanack.)

In adhering to Munger's advice of taking main ideas from other disciplines and applying them across other mental models, I lifted the NCAT technique from the discipline of clinical psychology.  NCAT is an acronym representing a method for handling and addressing internal conflicts, biases, and unruly emotions.  Warren Buffett's comments on his Dale Carnegie classes come to mind: “I did not take the course to prevent my knees from shaking when public speaking . . . but to do public speaking while my knees were knocking.” NCAT reminds me of just that - not crushing or suppressing feelings of anxiety or fear or sadness or uncertainty or anger or disappointment, but rather to competently move forward with the task at hand while those feelings are present.
What does NCAT stand for?


Name it: What are the emotions that I am feeling?  It is always best to stop and recognize what is happening internally.  By naming the emotion, you bring consciousness to it.  With that awareness comes more control over yourself and your actions.  Clearly outlining internal motivations is a significant aid in rational decision making.    

Claim it: Claim responsibility for those feelings.  Often times, anxiety & fear are created in one's own mind.  A particular action is only scary because that is how you feel about it.  Just because you are afraid of roller coasters or soliciting business from strangers does not mean that these are inherently scary undertakings. They are scary to you because that is the story your mind has built around the experience.  By recognizing that our own minds and stories are often responsible for irrational extrapolations of emotion, we can look at a 'scary' situation from a different angle, in a new light, with a different perspective.  

Accept it: Accept that you feel the way you do.  If it's anxiety that you feel, remind yourself that it is normal to feel anxious at times.  "Yes, I feel nervous right now."  Everyone feels it whether it shows or not.  Stop, take a deep breath and let the anxiety flow through your body and disperse.  That harder you try to suppress those feelings, the more concentrated they become, causing more internal tension.  By accepting your feelings, you can redirect the energy that it would take to fight how you feel, and channel the energy into more worthwhile endeavors. 

Tame it: After going through the previous 3 steps, you should be closer to "taming" what ails you.  Move forward and do whatever it is that you originally intended to.  By stepping into the unfamiliar, its unfamiliarity ends right then and there.  By bringing awareness, responsibility, and acceptance to the unpleasant or unfamiliar you shift your efforts towards achievement rather than defense.  

NCAT is something that I use to tone down the emotions inherent when making investment decisions.  By using NCAT and seeing a situation with logic, awareness, and consciousness, I can greatly reduce the occurrence of an emotionally charged, short-sighted reaction that I may later regret. 


Ex. 1

The Hot Seat

"This stock has tanked.  I am pretty scared at the sight of all that red on my screen.  I might have made a poor investment decision.  I should just bail."   

Ex. 2

"This stock has been a bottle-rocket and I've been sitting on my hands.  There are 15 'buy' ratings on it, and I've seen it mentioned about 50 times on a major business news channel.  I don't want to be the only one missing out.



In both examples, naming the feelings (anxiety or fear of missing out) brings consciousness and awareness to those emotions.  Are those good influencers of decision making?  No!  Claim those emotions and recognize what is happening inside.  Accept that you do feel a strong internal sense of urgency to act on those feelings, even if it is not in your best interest.  Tame those emotions by recognizing them, and realizing that the investments should be reexamined and based on fundamental merit rather than the unconscious compulsion to act swiftly and alleviate the near term pain.


Slowing down the process leads to better self examination.

Ex. 1 Revisited 
"If I sell this stock, is it because the price is way down and I can't take the pain, or has the story fundamentally changed and permanently impaired the company's future earnings power?"

Ex. 2 Revisited 
"If I'm chasing the price upwards, will I still have an adequate margin of safety - even at higher prices?  If everyone is already bullish on this stock and expectations are extremely high, what advantage do I have?"

Name It.
Claim It.
Accept It.
Tame It.

Steve Romick of FPA on Wealthtrack

See where the Internet lives

Charlie Munger was quoted at a Berkshire shareholder meeting a couple of years back saying that he thought Google had one of the widest economic moats he had ever encountered after reading In The Plex.

This inside look at their data centers is visual support to that claim.  I also remember in the Columbia Business School Class presentations Glenn Greenberg citing Google's tremendous infrastructure and world class talent pool/attraction as competitive advantages.  All investment pontifications aside, a look under the hood at Google is quite impressive! 

Check out this Wired.com story on the data centers as well as Google's own photo gallery linked just below.

Where the Internet Lives: Google Data Center Photo Gallery

Charlie Munger Talk at Harvard-Westlake from 2010

Charlie Munger is no doubt one of the greatest minds of today.  Not only an investor, but also a philosopher who I believe can be most likened to his role model, The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin.

Munger's lessons in both life and investing are profoundly insightful.  As Charlie often says, it is much better to learn vicariously by studying the folly and triumphs of others, then emulating the appropriate behavior.  With that being said, another Mungerism comes to mind that I often remind myself of: A lot of folks ask for advice, but very few take it. 

  

Munger Talk at Harvard-Westlake

Bruce Berkowitz on Wealthtrack

Steven Romick of FPA interview via GuruFocus

GuruFocus interviewed FPA's Steven Romick one day after QE3 was announced.  Here are some of Romick's thoughts on dealing with the macro in the context of being a bottoms up stock picker.  He also talks about idea generation and going to where the most negativity is to search for bargains.
 
Excerpts 
GuruFocus: Okay. So talk about the macro picture. What is the macro risk now?

Romick: I think today, the biggest thing is that the central banks think the only way out of this is just to print money, and so we’re in uncharted territory. We’ve taken what was an academic discussion and decided to experiment in the real world. There’s a whole range of outcomes, some that we can identify and others that I’m certain that we can’t identify, and it’s scary. Will we have inflation or deflation? If it is inflation, will it be a deflationary path to inflation? And then, how do we position a portfolio if we don’t have a strong conviction that it’s one or the other, inflation or deflation? What benefits a portfolio in an inflationary world is very different than what benefits a portfolio in a deflationary world. It’s very, very complicated.

On whether HPQ was a mistake:
Romick: It’s to be determined.


Steve Romick GuruFocus interview


 

Voter Registration Cutoff Today for 17 states!

Today is cutoff day for voter registration for 17 states:

Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
D.C.
Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Michigan
Montana
New Mexico
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Texas
Utah

 Rock the Vote Voter Registration link




TERRITORIAL GROWTH OF THE USA

As of August 7th, 1789

As of October 1st, 1804

As of March 30th, 1822

 

 

 

As of March 2nd, 1853

Present day U.S.

Link to Wikipedia article on US Territorial Acquisitions

Cook & Bynum: A young fund doing all the right things

Embedded below is a recent interview by The Manual of Ideas with Richard Cook and Dowe Bynum of the Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX).  The young managers both have prestigious prior experience working at Goldman Sachs and Tudor Investment Corp, respectively.  After reading the interview, I would not let age belie the duo's investment insight and process.  There are several traits exhibited in the interview that piqued my interest. Listed are some of the guiding tenants of the Cook & Bynum fund:

1. Astute subscribers to Munger's theory of Metal Models and building a mental latticework on which to hang one's ideas.
2. Buffett & Munger's belief in portfolio concentration - concentrating one's assets in one's best ideas.
3. Buffett & Munger's adherence to only working with the highest quality management with properly aligned incentives.   
4. Prefer to buy a great business at a fair price rather than a fair business at a great price.
5. Eating their own cooking.  The majority of their net worth is personally invested in the fund.
6. Ben Graham's landmark principle of investing with a Margin of Safety.

The interview below goes into more detail about their background, philosophy, and process.   I was a bit disappointed to see a 1.88% expense ratio, but hopefully that will go down as assets under management grow.  If Cook & Bynum stick to their guns as outlined in the interview, I would expected a very enviable long term track record. 


Manual of Ideas Interview With Cook Bynum With Disclaimers


Disclosure: this is not a recommendation to buy or sell any securities mentioned in this article or anywhere on this website. 

The Truth about Dishonesty

RSA Animate & Dan Ariely

Graham and Doddsville Fall Newsletter 2012

The Fall edition of the Graham & Doddsville newsletter from Columbia Business School was released today.  The G&D letter is always a great read and this issue is no exception.  In this issue there are interviews with Joel Greenblatt, Jim Tisch, Royce Associates, as well as photos from the Graham, Buffett and Beyond dinner in Omaha with speakers Thomas Russo, David Winters and Mario Gabelli.


Graham & Doddsville - Issue 16 - Fall 2012_vFINAL2

Daniel Loeb Third Point Q3 Investor Letter

Embedded below is Daniel Loeb of Third Point's most recent letter to investors.  Loeb is one of the few who has continually outperformed the market through a value and activist approach, as well as shifting funds into credit markets when the risk is worth the reward.  Loeb shares his thoughts Third Point's foray in the EU debt markets, as well as giving some color on recent equity investments in Murphy Oil and AIG.

On AIG:
"...Treasury’s ultimate sale of its remaining 16% stake in AIG will serve as a critical catalyst for the company, allowing initiation of a dividend, a change in management’s compensation structure to a more standard incentive-based bonus payout model, and the removal of the overhang” of Treasury ownership. Given these multiple paths to value creation, we believe  AIG’s current valuation at ~10x consensus 2013 earnings and 0.5x pro forma tangible book value of $65 per share has significant upside from these levels."

Loeb also manages to leave investors with a few choice quotes from 2Pac and Boyz II Men to shed further insights on Third Point's logic.

Third Point Q3 2012 Investor Letter TPOI

Zell: "Unreality and why everything is mispriced"

Sam Zell, a self-made real estate titan, is here speaking with the crew on CNBC.  Fortunately, they actually let him talk without bulldozing him with agenda based questions. Zell truly has a 20,000ft view of the economy, and he always speaks his mind.  His prognosis is not the rosiest.

"We need leadership, not criticism. We need encouragement, not discouragement..."
- Sam Zell

SAM ZELL CNBC INTERVIEW 

The Fraud Files

An interesting and quick read found via Santangel's Review showing the chart of one of the Madoff feeder funds.  Of course hindsight is 20/20, but looking at the chart of the Fairfield Sentry Fund is truly amazing...if it were real.  Cliche I know, but typically if things are too good to be true, then they are.  As Charlie Munger says, "There is no way to get rich with soft white hands."  Another quote that comes to mind is that of Richard Feynman which says, "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool."  I would imagine after being conditioned for decades of steadily upward performance, that one could start to believe in the viability of such "remarkable" performance. 


Sentry Fund Fraud Chart

Not so New

Keith Trauner and Larry Pitkowsky are the founders of the Goodhaven Fund (GOODX).  The fund is relatively new, but Trauner and Pitkowsky are not, having been integral parts of the team at Fairholme (FAIRX) with Bruce Berkowitz thru his finest years of out performance.  The interview linked below talks about their time at Fariholme, their philosophy and understanding of value investing, and the low down on some of their current favorite ideas.

The fund has put up decent numbers in its short existence, beating the S&P this year, though lagging a bit since inception in 2011.  Typically value will lag in a rising market as we have seen recently, but that is not all bad.  It is a sign that the managers have a clear cut value investment process that they are sticking to.  The true test will be in a significant market draw down.  If the GOODX managers truly invest with a Ben Graham-like margin of safety, then the fund's downside should be mitigated.  Furthermore, the managers have a significant portion of their personal wealth invested in the fund, so you can be assured that portfolio decisions are being made with shareholders best interest in mind. 


GOODHAVEN INTERVIEW






disclosure: this is not a recommendation to purchase any securities mentioned in this post or anywhere on the blog.  This blog strictly expresses the opinions of the author.

Music page update

FYI - I added a few songs to the TUNES tab in the Amazon player.  I ran across Anders Osborne, Junior Brown, Michael Kiwanuka, and another Bass Drum of Death track I thought I should share.  The drummer from BDOD is leaving for undisclosed reasons.  That's a bummer because he was a real bruiser when we saw them live at One Eyed Jack's in New Orleans.  Not sure how that will affect things going forward, but BDOD did say that a new LP was hitting the shelves soon.  Looking forward to that!

Recent commentary from FPA's Bob Rodriguez - "All In!"

"It is all about not underperforming the market or a benchmark, so don’t fight the Fed. Unfortunately, a strategy of following the Fed’s urging to take on greater risk will likely end in heartbreak. Should the stock market continue its upward march, both our clients and FPA’s portfolio managers will be tested. This is a time for discipline. Given that economic growth is languid at best and is likely slowing, the divergence between the stock market and economic reality cannot be sustained. One or the other has to adjust."
- Bob Rodriguez

Embedded below is Bob Rodriguez's latest commentary about the Fed's recent QE Infinity announcement.  That was a couple weeks ago, and the market's optimism about the maneuver is already fading.


all-in-commentary-9-2012BC714505E176